A randomized comparison of EUS-guided FNA versus CT or US-guided FNA for the evaluation of pancreatic mass lesions
- 1 June 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- Vol. 63 (7) , 966-975
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2005.09.028
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in patients with suspected pancreatic carcinomaCancer, 2003
- Endoscopic Ultrasound–Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of the PancreasActa Cytologica, 2003
- EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of the pancreas: Evaluation of pancreatitis as a complicationGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2002
- Pancreatic tissue sampling guided by EUS, CT/US, and surgery: A comparison of sensitivity and specificityGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2002
- Assessment of complications of EUS-guided fine-needle aspirationGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2001
- The clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosisand staging of pancreatic carcinomaGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1997
- Comparison between fine needle aspiration (FNA) directed CT biopsy (FNA-CT-Bx) and EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) for pancreatic carcinomaGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1997
- Accuracy of EUS-guided pancreatic biopsiesGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1997
- The use of EUS to diagnose malignant portal venous system invasion by pancreatic cancerGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1996
- Operative finding, treatment, and prognosis of carcinoma of the pancreas: An analysis of 267 casesJournal of Surgical Oncology, 1983