The Daily Living Programme
- 1 March 1992
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Royal College of Psychiatrists in The British Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 160 (3) , 379-384
- https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.160.3.379
Abstract
Patients with a serious mental illness requiring admission were randomised to home care or standard hospital care. Over the initial 18 months, 60 patients entered each group and were studied for a mean of 10 months. Home care reduced hospital use by 80%, with patients being admitted for a mean of 14 days, compared with 72 days for the standard group, but this bed-saving made no difference in direct treatment costs. Home care offers individualised treatment, and many patients require continuing support with the emphasis on areas such as finances and housing.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mental illness — who cares?Nature, 1989
- The Maudsley Daily Living Programme: A controlled cost-effectiveness study of community-based versus standard in-patient care of serious mental illnessPsychiatric Bulletin, 1988
- Psychiatric Hospital versus Community Treatment: The Results of a Randomised TrialAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 1983
- Mental hospitals and alternative care: Noninstitutionalization as potential public policy for mental patients.American Psychologist, 1982
- Alternative to Mental Hospital TreatmentArchives of General Psychiatry, 1980
- Alternative to Mental Hospital TreatmentArchives of General Psychiatry, 1980
- A Comparative Trial of Home and Hospital Psychiatric CareArchives of General Psychiatry, 1979
- The NIMH Community Support Program: Pilot Approach to a Needed Social Reform*Schizophrenia Bulletin, 1978
- The prevention of hospitalization in schizophrenia: Five years after an experimental program.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery, 1972
- Avoiding Mental Hospital Admission: A Follow-Up StudyAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1971