Rankings and symptom assessments of side effects from chemotherapy: insights from experienced patients with ovarian cancer
Top Cited Papers
- 9 November 2004
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Supportive Care in Cancer
- Vol. 13 (4) , 219-227
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-004-0710-6
Abstract
Although many patients with ovarian cancer achieve favorable responses to primary chemotherapy, the majority of women will experience recurrence of their cancer. Selection of second- or third-line chemotherapy ultimately depends on patient preferences for different side effects. To better understand this process, we evaluated preferences and symptom distress in patients with ovarian cancer. A total of 70 women with ovarian cancer who had previously received at least three cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy and currently undergoing chemotherapy for newly diagnosed or recurrent disease were interviewed in an outpatient chemotherapy clinic. The patients were asked to rank order 27 health states using a modified visual analog scale and to complete the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS). Most favorable health states included perfect health, clinical remission and complete control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Least favorable health states included more severe CINV health states and death. Patients on first-line chemotherapy had less symptom distress, and rated sexual dysfunction, fatigue and memory loss more favorably than patients on second- or third-line chemotherapy (PP=0.04). Married patients rated alopecia less favorably than unmarried patients (P=0.03), but married patients viewed certain CINV health states more favorably (P=0.02–0.04). CINV remains one of the most dreaded side effects of chemotherapy. Separate preference profiles exist for patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent disease, as well as for married versus unmarried patients. While MSAS scores and VAS rankings showed consistency across some health states, this was not true for CINV, suggesting that current symptom status may only influence patient preferences for selected side effects.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ovarian cancer: strategies for overcoming resistance to chemotherapyNature Reviews Cancer, 2003
- Patient Preferences Regarding Side Effects of Chemotherapy for Ovarian Cancer: Do They Change over Time?Gynecologic Oncology, 2002
- Ovarian cancer: progress and continuing controversies in managementEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2002
- Psychological Sequelae and Alopecia Among Women with CancerCancer Practice, 2001
- Visual Analog Scales: Do They Have a Role in the Measurement of Preferences for Health States?Medical Decision Making, 2001
- Visual Analog Scales: Do They Have a Role in the Measurement of Preferences for Health States?Medical Decision Making, 2001
- Changes in self-concept and body image during alopecia induced cancer chemotherapySupportive Care in Cancer, 1997
- Impact of nausea/vomiting on quality of life as a visual analogue scale-derived utility scoreSupportive Care in Cancer, 1996
- The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale: an instrument for the evaluation of symptom prevalence, characteristics and distressEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1994
- On the receiving end—patient perception of the side-effects of cancer chemotherapyEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1983