Health Selection vs. Causation in the Income Gradient: What Can We Learn from Graphical Trends?
- 1 May 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Project MUSE in Journal Of Health Care For The Poor and Underserved
- Vol. 19 (2) , 574-579
- https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.0.0018
Abstract
Income produces health, and sickness negatively affects earnings. These two factors likely explain the income gradient in health, but each has very different policy implications. In this paper, I examine graphical trends in mortality risk between low-income and higher-income people by age and gender. These trends suggest that forward causality (income affecting health) is more important than reverse causality (health affecting income) in the income-health gradient. However, there is some evidence to suggest that reverse causality plays an important role for younger men.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The income-associated burden of disease in the United StatesSocial Science & Medicine, 2005
- Policy Implications Of The Gradient Of Health And WealthHealth Affairs, 2002
- Disadvantage, Inequality, And Social PolicyHealth Affairs, 2002
- Causal Connections between Socio-Economic Status and Health: Reciprocal Effects and Mediating MechanismsJournal of Health and Social Behavior, 2002
- Socioeconomic Status and Health: What We Know and What We Don'tAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1999
- Healthy Bodies and Thick Wallets: The Dual Relation Between Health and Economic StatusJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1999
- Cumulative Impact of Sustained Economic Hardship on Physical, Cognitive, Psychological, and Social FunctioningNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- US mortality by economic, demographic, and social characteristics: the National Longitudinal Mortality Study.American Journal of Public Health, 1995
- The Evolving Concept of the Healthy Worker Survivor EffectEpidemiology, 1994