Consent to treatment and clinical decision analysis
Open Access
- 1 February 1989
- journal article
- Published by Royal College of Psychiatrists in Psychiatric Bulletin
- Vol. 13 (2) , 79-81
- https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.13.2.79
Abstract
The 1984 Scottish Mental Health Act (and its counterpart in England and Wales) invoked unique restrictions in medical practice in this country. For the first time certain standard treatments could not be given to particular patients unless an independent second opinion doctor authorised that treatment. Fortunately, in respect of drug treatment and ECT the second opinion doctors are themselves practising clinicians. Second opinion doctors are asked to give their opinion about the suitability of a proposed treatment using the following guidelines: “the appointed doctor will have in mind his/her understanding of practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of medical men skilled in this particular art in Scotland at this time and should avoid any idiosyncratic view of treatment however firmly held”.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can antidepressants cause mania and worsen the course of affective illness?American Journal of Psychiatry, 1987
- Personal ViewBMJ, 1987
- Decision AnalysisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Code of practice for the Mental Health Act 1983. "Patronising and unrealistic".BMJ, 1986
- Electroconvulsive Treatment in Great BritainThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1981