Character proof and the fireside induction.
- 1 January 1979
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Law and Human Behavior
- Vol. 3 (3) , 189-202
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01039790
Abstract
The present research examined psycholegal assumptions about specific acts evidence as a method of character proof. On the basis of “fireside induction” (Meehl, 1971) and social psychological research on inferential processes, it was expected that the logic behind the presumption against specific acts testimony would receive empirical support. In the context of a videotaped automobile negligence trial, nondeliberating experimental jurors were presented with character evidence expressed either in terms of specific acts or in terms of general reputation. Mode of presentation and the amount of testimony also were varied. Only post hoc support for the logic behind the presumption against specific acts testimony was obtained, and several factors that may have constrained its impact were considered.Keywords
Funding Information
- University of Michigan
- University of Minnesota
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- An integration theory analysis of jurors' presumptions of guilt or innocence.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978
- Social perception of rape victims: The impact of legal reform.Law and Human Behavior, 1978
- The Differential Impact of Abstract vs. Concrete Information on Decisions1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1977
- Justice needs a new blindfold: A review of mock jury research.Psychological Bulletin, 1977
- Psychology and the Law: an OvertureAnnual Review of Psychology, 1976
- Attribution and the psychology of prediction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975
- Real versus Reel: What's the Verdict?Journal of Communication, 1974
- On the psychology of prediction.Psychological Review, 1973
- Law and the Fireside Inductions: Some Reflections of a Clinical Psychologist1, 2,Journal of Social Issues, 1971
- Belief in the law of small numbers.Psychological Bulletin, 1971