Judgments of Azimuth and Elevation as a Function of Monoscopic and Binocular Depth Cues Using a Perspective Display
- 1 March 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Vol. 37 (1) , 173-181
- https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049453
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of three-dimensional display formats for judgments of spatial information using an exocentric frame of reference. Eight subjects judged the azimuth and elevation that separated two computer-generated objects using either a perspective or stereoscopic display. Errors, which consisted of the difference in absolute value between the estimated and actual azimuth or elevation, were analyzed as the response variable. The data indicated that the stereoscopic display resulted in more accurate estimates of elevation, especially for images aligned approximately orthogonally to the viewing vector. However, estimates of relative azimuth direction were not improved by use of the stereoscopic display. Furthermore, it was shown that the effect of compression resulting from a 45--deg computer graphics eye point elevation produced a response bias that was symmetrical around the horizontal plane of the reference cube, and that the depth cue of binocular disparity provided by the stereoscopic display reduced the magnitude of the compression errors. Implications of the results for the design of spatial displays are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spatial Judgments with Monoscopic and Stereoscopic Presentation of Perspective DisplaysHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1992
- Exocentric Judgements in Real Environments and Stereoscopic DisplaysProceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 1991
- Visual Enhancements and Geometric Field of View as Factors in the Design of a Three-Dimensional Perspective DisplayProceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 1990
- Operator Performance as a Function of Type of Display: Conventional versus PerspectiveHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1988
- Quantitative Evaluation of Perspective and Stereoscopic Displays in Three-Axis Manual Tracking TasksIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1987
- The Effect of Perspective Geometry on Judged Direction in Spatial Information InstrumentsHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1986
- Influence of a Perspective Cockpit Traffic Display Format on Pilot Avoidance ManeuversPublished by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1983
- Stereo TV Improves Operator Performance Under Degraded Visibility ConditionsOptical Engineering, 1981