Does making content relevant make a difference in learning?
- 1 March 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Research Reports
- Vol. 15 (2) , 121-129
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099809362106
Abstract
Instructors consistently search for methods to enhance students’ motivation and learning. Immediacy and relevance have been linked to increased motivation in the classroom. The purpose of this study was to extend research by Frymier and Shulman (1995) that found immediacy and relevance to be associated with one another. A 2 (high and low immediacy) x 2 (high and low relevance) experimental design was used to investigate the interaction between immediacy and relevance and their impact on motivation and learning. Results indicated that immediacy had a significant impact on motivation and learning, while relevance did not. The manipulation of relevance was problematic and is discussed extensively.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Food for thought: Teacher nonverbal immediacy, student learning, and curvilinearityCommunication Education, 1995
- “What's in it for me?”: Increasing content relevance to enhance students' motivationCommunication Education, 1995
- A model of immediacy in the classroomCommunication Quarterly, 1994
- Classroom motivation: Strategies of first-year teachers.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1991
- The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learningCommunication Education, 1990
- Communication in the classroom: Power and motivationCommunication Education, 1990
- Effects of immediacy on recall of informationCommunication Education, 1988
- The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learningCommunication Education, 1988
- The systematic process of motivational designPerformance + Instruction, 1987
- Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional designJournal of Instructional Development, 1987