Vowel and Consonant Confusions among Cochlear Implant Patients: Do Different Implants Make a Difference?
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology
- Vol. 96 (1_suppl) , 141-144
- https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894870960s178
Abstract
Vowel and consonant confusions were obtained from two patients, one using the Melbourne implant (M3) and one the Utah device (U1). The confusion matrices were analyzed using information transfer analysis and multidimensional scaling. The results from the two patients were generally consistent with the different processing strategies of their implants. For the vowels, M3 appeared to be processing second formant (F2) and duration, whereas U1 appeared to be attending primarily to first formant (F1) and duration. For the consonants, the responses of M3 reflected sensitivity to frication, voicing, and envelope, whereas the results from U1 suggested sensitivity to voicing, nasal, frication, and possibly “place” information.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Vowel Confusions of Hearing-Impaired Listeners under Reverberant and Nonreverberant ConditionsJournal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1985
- Initial Iowa Results with the Multichannel Cochlear Implant from MelbourneJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1984
- A 12-Consonant Confusion Study on a Multiple-Channel Cochlear Implant PatientJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1982
- Speech discrimination in deaf subjects with cochlear implantsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1980