A Comparison of the Leiter-R and the Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test (UNIT) with Children Classified as Language Impaired
- 1 September 2000
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
- Vol. 18 (3) , 268-274
- https://doi.org/10.1177/073428290001800306
Abstract
The Leiter-R and the Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test (UNIT) were administered in counterbalanced order to 43 children (12 females, 31 males) who were classified as severely language disordered (mean age = 8.55, SD = 1.78). All standard scores were depressed and ranged from 65.07 (Leiter Fluid Reasoning Composite) to 70.00 (UNIT Symbolic Memory), suggesting global cognitive deficits that extend beyond language. Correlations and t-test analyses compared similar scores. The correlations were significant (i.e., Leiter-R Visualization and Reasoning Battery Full Scale IQ/UNIT Full Scale IQ= .80, Leiter-R Fluid Reasoning Subscale/UNIT Reasoning Subscale = .66); t-test computations were nonsignificant. Given the critical language deficiencies of this population, it was concluded that either battery provided a nonbiased assessment of cognitive abilities. Qualitative strengths and weaknesses of both tests were discussed.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment of Hearing-Impaired and Deaf Children with the WISC-IIIPublished by Elsevier ,1998
- Utility of the WISC-III for Children with Language ImpairmentsPublished by Elsevier ,1998
- Nonverbal Intellectual Assessment of Hispanic and Speech-Impaired AdolescentsPsychological Reports, 1997
- WISC-III Verbal Item Invariance across Samples of Deaf and Hearing Children of Similar Measured AbilityJournal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 1996
- The Underlying Nature of Specific Language ImpairmentJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1992
- Sequential and simultaneous processing abilities of high-functioning autistic and language-impaired childrenJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1991
- A unifying model for the structure of intellectual abilitiesIntelligence, 1984