Patterns of fractionation for palliation of bone metastases
- 1 February 1995
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Australasian Radiology
- Vol. 39 (1) , 31-35
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1673.1995.tb00228.x
Abstract
The patterns of fractionation used to treat bone metastases in a single centre in two time periods were determined. Clinical audit was carried out, for two periods of 6 months each, in 1988 and 1993. Data recorded included patient, tumour and treatment variables. Palliation of bone metastases represented 40% and 44% of palliative treatment courses, and 20% and 21% of total treatment courses, respectively, in both time periods. Shorter treatment schedules were used in 1993 compared to 1988, with mean fraction numbers of 6.4 versus 8.5, respectively (P < 0.001). This reduction in fraction numbers occurred for the common primary tumour sites. In 1993, the mean numbers of fractions used were related to the primary tumour site (7.8 fractions for breast, 5.0 for lung, 6.7 for melanoma, 6.4 for other primary sites, P= 0.05), the treatment site (7.3 fractions for weight-bearing bones, 4.0 for non-weight-bearing bones, P < 0.001) and patient address (6.0 fractions for city postcode vs 7.8 for country postcode, P= 0.02). Treating radiation oncologist (5.7-7.8 mean fractions, P= 0.06) and patient age (P= 0.56) were not significant factors for the number of fractions used. It is likely that there were multiple causes for a reduction in the number of fractions used to treat bone metastases, including the results of clinical trials and increasing pressure to optimize the use of scarce resources. However, patients who may have a better prognosis (breast primary) and those with metastases in weight-bearing bones continued to receive longer treatment schedules.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patterns of palliative radiotherapy in CanadaClinical Oncology, 1993
- Dear sir,: re: Waiting Lists for Radiation TreatmentAustralasian Radiology, 1992
- Dear sir,: “How should a waiting list for treatment be managed?”Australasian Radiology, 1992
- HOW SHOULD A WAITING LIST FOR TREATMENT BE MANAGED?Australasian Radiology, 1992
- Treatment strategies in advanced and metastatic cancer: Differences in attitude between the USA, Canada and EuropeInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1992
- Shades of Gray: A Personal View of Palliation by Radiotherapy*Australasian Radiology, 1991
- Why don't British radiotherapists give single fractions of radiotherapy for bone metastases?Clinical Oncology, 1989
- Radiation Oncology in Australia: An Increasing CrisisAustralasian Radiology, 1988
- Prospective randomised trial of single and multifraction radiotherapy schedules in the treatment of painful bony metastasesRadiotherapy and Oncology, 1986