Comparison of point estimators of normal percentiles
- 1 January 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation
- Vol. 6 (3) , 269-283
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03610917708812044
Abstract
There are available several point estimators of the percentiles of a normal distribution with both mean and variance unknown. Consequently, it would seem appropriate to make a comparison among the estimators through some “closeness to the true value” criteria. Along these lines, the concept of Pitman-closeness efficiency is introduced. Essentially, when comparing two estimators, the Pit-man-closeness efficiency gives the “odds” in favor of one of the estimators being closer to the true value than is the other in a given situation. Through the use of Pitman-closeness efficiency, this paper compares (a) the maximum likelihood estimator, (b) the minimum variance unbiased estimator, (c) the best invariant estimator, and (d) the median unbiased estimator within a class of estimators which includes (a), (b), and (c). Mean squared efficiency is also discussed.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Optimum Estimators for Linear Functions of Location and Scale ParametersThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1969
- A Survey of Properties and Applications of the Noncentral t-DistributionTechnometrics, 1968
- THE ESTIMATION OF THE LOCATION AND SCALE PARAMETERS OF A CONTINUOUS POPULATION OF ANY GIVEN FORMBiometrika, 1939