Sensing and Tachyarrhythmia Detection Problems in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators
- 1 June 1996
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
- Vol. 7 (6) , 542-558
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.1996.tb00562.x
Abstract
Sensing of cardiac activity and detection of tachyarrhythmias in implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are complex functions and errors occur. Sources of sensing-detection errors include the variable nature of intracardiac electrograms, the occasional inability of automatically adjusting signal amplifiers to cope with this variability, problems with sensing leads, inappropriate programming, and limitations of tachyarrhythmia detection algorithms, which are optimized to avoid underdetection of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Current ICDs vary considerably in details of sensing and detection function, programmability, and diagnostic data, so that a through knowledge of each device is necessary to diagnose and correct these problems. Stored intracardiac electrograms and/or marker channels available in most of these devices have contributed much to our understanding of sensing-detection errors. Undersensing of individual signals, most frequently due to signal variability and/or inability of the amplifier to adjust adequately, can lead to delay or failure of tachyarrhythmia detection. Delay or failure of tachyarrhythmia detection can also occur if algorithms to enhance specificity, such as sudden onset or rate stability, are utilized. Oversensing of T waves or noise can lead to false detection; however, the most common cause of false detection is the inability of current detection algorithms to distinguish supraventricular from ventricular tachyarrhythmias. New algorithms that incorporate atrial sensing, electrogram morphology analysis, or hemodynamic monitoring may result in improved detection accuracy of ICDs in the future.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incidence, presentation, diagnosis, and management of malfunctioning implantable cardioverter-defibrillator rate-sensing leadsAmerican Heart Journal, 1994
- Importance of abortive shock capability with electrogram storage in cardioverter-defibrillator devicesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1993
- Inappropriate Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Shocks Secondary to Sensing Lead Failure: Utility of Stored ElectrogramsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1993
- Arrhythmias induced by device antitachycardia therapy due to diagnostic nonspecificityJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1991
- Smooth muscle cell proliferation and restenosis after stand alone coronary excimer laser angioplastyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1991
- Value of ventricular electrogram recordings in the diagnosis of arrhythmias precipitating electrical device shock therapyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1991
- Effect of rate augmentation and isoproterenol on the amplitude of atrial and ventricular electrogramsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- The automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Efficacy, complications and survival in patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmiasJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1988
- Unipolar pacer artifacts induced failure of an automatic implantable cardioverter/defibrillator to detect ventricular fibrillationThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1986
- Pacing threshold changes after transvenous catheter countershockThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1984