Promoting Remedial Response to the Risk of Radon: Are Information Campaigns Enough?
- 1 October 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Science, Technology, & Human Values
- Vol. 14 (4) , 360-379
- https://doi.org/10.1177/016224398901400403
Abstract
New Jersey residents who tested their homes for radon and found more than four picocuries per liter were surveyed (and a subsample interviewed) about their knowledge, emotions, attitudes, and intentions to take remedial action Respondents proved well informed, but radon levels were not highly correlated with any of the response variables. Overoptimism was more common than overreaction. The results suggest that active guidance is needed to ensure appropriate responses to environmental hazards, like radon, that require individual remediation. Simple information dissemination alone seems inadequate.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Public Response to the Risk from Geological RadonJournal of Communication, 1987
- Radon Risk Information and Voluntary Protection: Evidence from a Natural ExperimentRisk Analysis, 1987
- Community Dynamics in Coping with Toxic ContaminantsPublished by Springer Nature ,1987
- Six Propositions on Public Participation and Their Relevance for Risk CommunicationRisk Analysis, 1986
- Human System Responses to DisasterPublished by Springer Nature ,1986
- Societal Response to Hazards and Major Hazard Events: Comparing Natural and Technological HazardsPublic Administration Review, 1985
- Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983
- Knowing How to Behave under the Threat of DisasterEnvironment and Behavior, 1983
- Blueprint for Breakdown: Three Mile Island and the Media Before the AccidentJournal of Communication, 1981
- The silence of scientistsChemical & Engineering News, 1980