Computerizing guidelines: factors for success.
- 1 January 1996
- journal article
- p. 459-62
Abstract
Clinical practice guidelines are being touted as a cure for the tension between health care cost and quality. Rather than being just a means of controlling clinicians, guidelines also offer the chance to improve the quality of care by reducing practice variation and adherence to standards of good care. To be operationalized via computers, guidelines must be accepted by the clinicians, who must fully intend to follow them. They must be timely and use available data with minimal additional data entry by clinicians. Finally, they should have a measurable effect and be shown to improve care processes and/or outcomes.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Computerizing Guidelines to Improve Care and Patient Outcomes: The Example of Heart FailureJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1995
- Physician inpatient order writing on microcomputer workstations. Effects on resource utilization.1993
- The Regenstrief Medical Record System: 20 years of experience in hospitals, clinics, and neighborhood health centers.1992
- Promoting cancer prevention activities by primary care physicians. Results of a randomized, controlled trial.1991
- Practice randomization and clinical research. The Indiana experience.1991
- The Effect on Test Ordering of Informing Physicians of the Charges for Outpatient Diagnostic TestsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Computerized Display of Past Test ResultsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1987
- The impact of reading on physicians' nonadherence to recommended standards of medical careSocial Science & Medicine, 1985
- Reminders to Physicians from an Introspective Computer Medical RecordAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1984