A Methodological Critique of the 'Ideal Weight' Concept
- 22 July 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 250 (4) , 506-510
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1983.03340040046030
Abstract
This article raises several objections to the procedures that were employed to determine ideal (optimal, desirable) weights in the 1959 and 1979 Build and Blood Pressure studies, the Framingham (Mass) study, and the recent study of the relationship between weight and mortality carried out by the American Cancer Society. The new height-weight tables based on the 1979 Build and Blood Pressure study are also criticized. The article concludes with the recommendation that the concept of ideal weight be abandoned and that attention be devoted to the morbidity and mortality experience of "outliers" (the very thin and the very obese). (JAMA1983;250:506-510)Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variations in mortality by weight among 750,000 men and womenPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Body build and mortality. The Framingham studyJAMA, 1980
- Some Re-Evaluations of theBuild and Blood Pressure Study, 1959as Related to Ponderal Index, Somatotype and MortalityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1966
- The measurement of success in weight reduction: An analysis of methods and a new indexJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1959