Mitral valve replacement versus mitral valve repair. A Doppler and quantitative stress echocardiographic study.
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 89 (1) , 132-137
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.89.1.132
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standard mitral valve replacement (MVR) in patients with chronic mitral regurgitation results in consistent reductions in resting postoperative ejection fraction. This has been attributed to removal of the low-impedance ejection pathway into the left atrium or to disruption of the chordal apparatus. Mitral valve repair (MVP) does not reduce ejection fraction at rest. However, whether MVP confers any advantages with regard to dynamic left ventricular performance has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to directly compare standard MVR with MVP and to determine their respective influences on ventricular ejection performance during bicycle exercise. METHODS AND RESULTS Ten consecutive patients with pure chronic mitral regurgitation who underwent MVP and 10 patients matched for age, sex, and preoperative ejection fraction who underwent standard MVR for pure chronic mitral regurgitation performed symptom-limited, graded upright bicycle exercise with simultaneous Doppler and quantitative two-dimensional echocardiography. Patients with MVP had significantly greater rest (55 +/- 12%) and exercise (63 +/- 11%) ejection fractions than matched patients with MVR (40 +/- 13% [P < .0001] and 42 +/- 17% [P < .005], respectively). End-systolic circumferential wall stress was significantly lower at rest (190 +/- 36 versus 244 +/- 46; P < .03) and at peak exercise (231 +/- 46 versus 300 +/- 52; P < .02) in patients with MVP. At peak exercise, left ventricular shape was significantly more spherical in patients with MVR than those with MVP (1.84 +/- 0.31 versus 2.45 +/- 0.59; P < .02). CONCLUSIONS MVR with chordal transection resulted in significant reductions in rest and exercise ejection fraction. This was caused in part by a significant increase in end-systolic circumferential wall stress. MVP resulted in improved rest and exercise ejection indexes, primarily due to a marked reduction in end-systolic stress and maintenance of a more ellipsoidal chamber geometry.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of mitral valve repair for mitral valve prolapse on regression of left ventricular massThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1992
- Quantitative two-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular shape in ischemic heart diseaseJournal of Clinical Ultrasound, 1989
- Physiologic role of the mitral apparatus in left ventricular regional mechanics, contraction synergy, and global systolic performanceThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1989
- Left ventricular shape, afterload and survival in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1989
- Early postoperative changes in left ventricular chamber size, architecture, and function in aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation and their relation to intraoperative changes in afterload: a prospective two-dimensional echocardiographic study.Circulation, 1987
- Left ventricular performance after mitral reconstruction for mitral regurgitationThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1984
- Chronic mitral regurgitation: Predictive value of preoperative echocardiographic indexes of left ventricular function and wall stressJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1984
- Left ventricular function before and following surgical treatment of mitral valve diseaseAmerican Heart Journal, 1979
- Cardiac shape and function in aortic valve disease: Physiologic and clinical implicationsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1977