Routine use of anaerobic blood cultures: are they still indicated?
- 15 April 2000
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 108 (6) , 445-447
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00410-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analysis of 281,797 Consecutive Blood Cultures Performed over an Eight-Year Period: Trends in Microorganisms Isolated and the Value of Anaerobic Culture of BloodClinical Infectious Diseases, 1997
- Anaerobic BacteremiaClinical Infectious Diseases, 1996
- Host factors predisposing to anaerobic infectionsFEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology, 1993
- Routine anaerobic blood cultures: Reasons for continued useClinical Microbiology Newsletter, 1992
- Anaerobic bacteremia: Incidence, patient characteristics, and clinical significanceThe American Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Routine anaerobic blood cultures: Still appropriate today?Clinical Microbiology Newsletter, 1991
- Anaerobic Bacteremia: Decreasing Rate Over a 15-Year PeriodClinical Infectious Diseases, 1991
- Anaerobic Bacterial Bacteremia: 12-Year Experience in Two Military HospitalsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1989
- Blood Cultures: Issues and ControversiesClinical Infectious Diseases, 1986
- The Clinical Significance of Positive Blood Cultures: A Comprehensive Analysis of 500 Episodes of Bacteremia and Fungemia in Adults. I. Laboratory and Epidemiologic ObservationsClinical Infectious Diseases, 1983