The Effect of Diagnostic Confidence on the Probability of Optical Colonoscopic Confirmation of Potential Polyps Detected on CT Colonography: Prospective Assessment in 1,339 Asymptomatic Adults
- 1 December 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Roentgen Ray Society in American Journal of Roentgenology
- Vol. 183 (6) , 1661-1665
- https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.183.6.01831661
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. We sought to evaluate the effect of interpreter confidence on the likelihood that a lesion detected on CT colonography (CTC) will correspond to a matched polyp seen on optical colonoscopy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Same-day CTC and optical colonoscopy were performed on 1,339 asymptomatic adults. A standard matching algorithm for polyp size and location was used. For each potential polyp detected on CTC, the level of diagnostic confidence was prospectively rated on a 3-point scale (1, least certain; 2, intermediate; and 3, most certain). RESULTS. For CTC-detected lesions 6 mm or larger, diagnostic confidence levels of 1, 2, and 3 corresponded to matched polyps on optical colonoscopy in 33.3% (45/135), 50.0% (103/206), and 66.8% (157/235) of cases, respectively (p < 0.01). Similar trends were present for categories of lesions that measured 6–7 mm, 8–9 mm, and 10 mm or larger, rising to a match rate of 82.1% (55/67) for lesions 10 mm or larger that were diagnosed with a level-3 confidence rating. The likelihood that a matched polyp was adenomatous increased with greater levels of diagnostic confidence. Of note, level-3 confidence for lesions measuring 8–9 mm on CTC more often yielded a matching neoplasm on optical colonoscopy than level-1 or level-2 confidence for lesions measuring 10 mm or larger (60.3% [35/58] vs 20.8% [10/48]; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION. Greater diagnostic confidence for an individual lesion detected on CTC correlates with a significantly increased likelihood that a matching polyp will be found on optical colonoscopy and that this matched polyp will be neoplastic. Although polyp size represents the primary criterion for CTC screening algorithms, this data could help guide the decision to opt for noninvasive CTC surveillance versus optical colonoscopy for polypectomy.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Electrocardiographically Gated 16-Section CT of the Thorax: Cardiac Motion SuppressionRadiology, 2004
- CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy) for primary colorectal screening: challenges facing clinical implementationAbdominal Radiology, 2004
- Computed Tomographic Virtual Colonoscopy to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia in Asymptomatic AdultsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Electronic Cleansing and Stool Tagging in CT Colonography: Advantages and Pitfalls with Primary Three-Dimensional EvaluationAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2003
- Update on Colorectal Polyps: Management and Follow-Up SurveillanceEndoscopy, 2003
- Surveillance After Positive and Negative Colonoscopy Examinations: Issues, Yields, and UseAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 2003
- Clinical Relevance of the Small Colorectal PolypEndoscopy, 2001
- Is in vivo measurement of size of polyps during colonoscopy accurate?Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1997
- Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years.Gut, 1996
- Growth of Colorectal Polyps: Recovery and Evaluation of Unresected Polyps of Less Than 10 mm, 1 Year after DetectionScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1994