Open Versus Closed Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage
- 1 July 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 200 (1) , 24-28
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198407000-00004
Abstract
A total of 118 trauma patients were prospectively randomized to receive either open or closed peritoneal lavage. In addition, comparisons were made between using an infraumbilical vs. a supraumbilical approach in patients with pelvic fractures. No statistical difference was noted between the open and closed groups, despite the overall accuracy rate of 96.6%. The supraumbilical approach was vastly superior to the infraumbilical approach in patients with pelvic fracture with an accuracy rate of 90.9% vs. 57%. In this regard, use of the infraumbilical approach in this setting is to be highly discouraged. Finally, patient body habitus, technique and physician experience all play a role in the outcome of the lavage.This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- PERITONEAL-LAVAGE IN BLUNT ABDOMINAL-TRAUMA1981
- PITFALLS OF PERITONEAL-LAVAGE IN BLUNT ABDOMINAL-TRAUMA1980
- Diagnostic Errors With Peritoneal Lavage in Patients With Pelvic FracturesArchives of Surgery, 1979
- OPEN DIAGNOSTIC PERITONEAL-LAVAGE IN BLUNT TRAUMA VICTIMS1979
- Diagnostic peritoneal lavage: Fourteen years and 2,586 patients laterThe American Journal of Surgery, 1978
- Diagnostic peritoneal lavage is superior to clinical evaluation in blunt abdominal trauma.1978
- Experience with routine open abdominal paracentesis.1978
- Blunt Abdominal TraumaArchives of Surgery, 1976
- Abdominal lavage in blunt traumaBritish Journal of Surgery, 1975
- Peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal traumaThe American Journal of Surgery, 1973