Medicine, rhetoric, and euthanasia: A case study in the workings of a postmodern discourse
- 1 May 1993
- journal article
- case report
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Quarterly Journal of Speech
- Vol. 79 (2) , 201-224
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639309384029
Abstract
The purpose of this essay is to begin an inquiry into the rhetoric of what has been acknowledged as one of the most important and controversial issues of our time: euthanasia. Attention is focused primarily on the medical profession's involvement with the issue. A brief history is provided of the relationship that exists between medicine, rhetoric, and euthanasia. The majority of the essay is devoted to offering a critical reading of a controversial narrative on euthanasia that appeared in the Journal of the American Medical Association. In paying particular attention to what this narrative is doing rhetorically—how it means, not just what it means—the suggestion is developed that the story is addressing both its topic and its readers in a “postmodern” manner. The essay concludes with an assessment of this rhetorical strategy.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Public memorializing in postmodernity: The Vietnam veterans memorial as prototypeQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1991
- Terminating life-sustaining treatment--recent US developments.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1988
- 'It's over, Debbie' and the euthanasia debatePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1988
- It's Over, DebbiePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1988
- It's over, DebbiePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1988
- 'Doctors must not kill'Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1988
- Article Embroils JAMA in Ethical ControversyScience, 1988
- A review of the ethical and legal aspects of terminating medical careThe American Journal of Medicine, 1988
- A piece of my mind. It's over, DebbieJAMA, 1988
- Making a CaseLiterature and Medicine, 1988