Cost-Effectiveness of Intensified Versus Conventional Multifactorial Intervention in Type 2 Diabetes
Open Access
- 1 August 2008
- journal article
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 31 (8) , 1510-1515
- https://doi.org/10.2337/dc07-2452
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—To assess the cost-effectiveness of intensive versus conventional therapy for 8 years as applied in the Steno-2 study in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A Markov model was developed to incorporate event and risk data from Steno-2 and account Danish-specific costs to project life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE), and lifetime direct medical costs expressed in year 2005 Euros. Clinical and cost outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes and discounted at 3% annually. Sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS—Intensive treatment was associated with increased life expectancy, QALE, and lifetime costs compared with conventional treatment. Mean ± SD undiscounted life expectancy was 18.1 ± 7.9 years with intensive treatment and 16.2 ± 7.3 years with conventional treatment (difference 1.9 years). Discounted life expectancy was 13.4 ± 4.8 years with intensive treatment and 12.4 ± 4.5 years with conventional treatment. Lifetime costs (discounted) for intensive and conventional treatment were €45,521 ± 19,697 and €41,319 ± 27,500, respectively (difference €4,202). Increased costs with intensive treatment were due to increased pharmacy and consultation costs. Discounted QALE was 1.66 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) higher for intensive (10.2 ± 3.6 QALYs) versus conventional (8.6 ± 2.7 QALYs) treatment, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €2,538 per QALY gained. This is considered a conservative estimate because accounting prescription of generic drugs and capturing indirect costs would further favor intensified therapy. CONCLUSIONS—From a health care payer perspective in Denmark, intensive therapy was more cost-effective than conventional treatment. Assuming that patients in both arms were treated in a primary care setting, intensive therapy became dominant (cost- and lifesaving).Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- A cost-effectiveness analysis of fluvastatin in patients with diabetes after successful percutaneous coronary interventionClinical Therapeutics, 2005
- Modelling EuroQol health‐related utility values for diabetic complications from CODE‐2 dataHealth Economics, 2004
- Standards of Medical Care for Patients With Diabetes MellitusDiabetes Care, 2003
- Estimating Utility Values for Health States of Type 2 Diabetic Patients Using the EQ-5D (UKPDS 62)Medical Decision Making, 2002
- UKPDS 60Stroke, 2002
- Estimating Utility Values for Health States of Type 2 Diabetic Patients Using the EQ-5D (UKPDS 62)Medical Decision Making, 2002
- Primer on Medical Decision Analysis: Part 5—Working with Markov ProcessesMedical Decision Making, 1997
- Albuminuria and poor glycemic control predict mortality in NIDDMDiabetes, 1995
- Markov Models in Medical Decision MakingMedical Decision Making, 1993
- Microalbuminuria Predicts Clinical Proteinuria and Early Mortality in Maturity-Onset DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984