Double-contrast barium-enema examination and endoscopy in the detection of polypoid lesions in the cecum and ascending colon.
- 1 July 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 144 (2) , 257-260
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.144.2.7089277
Abstract
Fifty-three patients with 54 polypoid lesions in the ascending colon and cecum underwent colonscopy and double-contract Ba enema examination (DC-BE). Colonscopy could not completely examine the cecum in 3 patients (failure rate 6%) and DC-BE had 4 false positive results. Colonscopy detected 40 lesions (sensitivity 78%) and DC-BE 45 lesions (sensitivity 88%). A carcinoma and a villous adenoma were missed by both methods. The overall accuracy for colonoscopy was 80%, 76% if corrected for unsuccessful procedures. DC-BE showed accuracy rates of 82% and 83%. In combination, the 2 methods had 97% accuracy. DC-BE is slightly better than colonoscopy for evaluating well-prepared patients with suscepted polypoid lesions in the right colon, but stresses the complementary nature of the 2 methods and the need for repeating negative examinations by 1 modality in the presence of a positive result by the other.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Detection of rectal and rectosigmoid lesions by double-contrast barium enema examination and sigmoidoscopy. Accuracy of technique and efficacy of standard overhead views.Radiology, 1982
- Colorectal carcinoma missed on double contrast barium enema study: a problem in perceptionAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1981
- Polypoid Colonic Lesions Undetected by EndoscopyRadiology, 1978
- Changes in site distribution of colorectal carcinoma in Connecticut, 1940–1973Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 1977
- Comparison of Barium Enema and Colonoscopy in the Detection of Small Colonic PolypsRadiology, 1977
- Barium-Enema Examination with Large-Bore Tubing and DrainageRadiology, 1964