Does Preoperative Topical Antimicrobial Scrub Reduce Positive Surgical Site Culture Rates in Men Undergoing Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement?
- 31 October 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 178 (4) , 1328-1332
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.146
Abstract
We determined if the incidence of a perioperative surgical site-positive culture was reduced by a 5-day topical antimicrobial scrub before implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter. A single surgeon prospective cohort study was conducted of 100 consecutive artificial urinary sphincter implants placed between May 2003 and November 2005. We compared 50 men who performed preoperative topical antimicrobial scrub with 4% chlorhexidine to the abdominal site and perineal site with 50 men who used their normal hygiene (soap and water). All received povidone-iodine skin disinfection before incision, and bacterial cultures of the abdominal and perineal sites were collected immediately after skin disinfection and after artificial urinary sphincter implantation. Baseline comparisons between groups were done with the Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher exact tests. Predictors of positive culture were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The causes of incontinence were radical prostatectomy (90), radiation therapy (8) and transurethral resection of the prostate (2). There were no baseline differences between the groups including age, diabetes or previous urethral surgery. Overall 140 of the 400 cultures were positive with only 37% of the positive cultures (52 of 140) observed with topical antimicrobial scrub. For the perineal site the only factor affecting preoperative culture status was topical antimicrobial scrub (OR 0.23, p = 0.003). A positive postoperative culture was predicted by a positive preoperative perineal (OR 4.61, p = 0.003) and abdominal culture (OR 3.80, p = 0.013). Preoperative topical antimicrobial scrub resulted in a 4-fold reduction in preoperative perineal colonization rate and overall reduction in positive surgical site cultures. Given the low cost, safety and efficacy, topical antimicrobial scrub should be considered before artificial urinary sphincter placement.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcomes Following Erosions of the Artificial Urinary SphincterJournal of Urology, 2006
- Comparison of the Long-Term Outcomes Between Incontinent Men and Women Treated With Artificial Urinary SphincterJournal of Urology, 2006
- Device-Related Infections: A ReviewJournal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, 2005
- Device‐Associated Infections: A Macroproblem that Starts with MicroadherenceClinical Infectious Diseases, 2001
- LONG-TERM CONTINENCE AND PATIENT SATISFACTION AFTER ARTIFICIAL SPHINCTER IMPLANTATION FOR URINARY INCONTINENCE AFTER PROSTATECTOMYJournal of Urology, 2001
- Usefulness of an Alcohol Solution of N-Duopropenide for the Surgical Antisepsis of the Hands Compared with Handwashing with Iodine–Povidone and Chlorhexidine: Clinical EssayJournal of Surgical Research, 2000
- MAYO CLINIC LONG-TERM ANALYSIS OF THE FUNCTIONAL DURABILITY OF THE AMS 800 ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTER: A REVIEW OF 323 CASESJournal of Urology, 1998
- Post-Prostatectomy incontinence and the Artificial Urinary Sphincter: A Long-Term Study of Patient Satisfaction and Criteria for SuccessJournal of Urology, 1996
- The Artificial Urinary Sphincter (AS 800): Experience in 166 Consecutive PatientsJournal of Urology, 1992
- Periprosthetic InfectionsJournal of Urology, 1987