An experimental investigation of procedural issues in complex tort trials.
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Law and Human Behavior
- Vol. 14 (3) , 269-285
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01352753
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Responses to corporate versus individual wrongdoing.Law and Human Behavior, 1989
- The effects of outlier presence, plaintiff population size, and aggregation of plaintiffs on simulated civil jury decisions.Law and Human Behavior, 1988
- The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line.Psychological Review, 1986
- Decisions and memory: Differential retrievability of consistent and contradictory evidenceJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1984
- Victimization, self-monitoring, and eyewitness identification.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984
- The Causal Connection in Mass Exposure Cases: A "Public Law" Vision of the Tort SystemHarvard Law Review, 1984
- Jury Trial of Complex Cases: English Practice at the Time of the Seventh AmendmentColumbia Law Review, 1980
- Repetition, order of presentation, and timing of arguments and measures as determinants of opinion change.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968
- Split Trials and Time Saving: A Statistical AnalysisHarvard Law Review, 1963
- Recency and primacy in persuasion as a function of the timing of speeches and measurements.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1959