Evaluating the performance of cryospheric models1
- 1 April 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Polar Geography
- Vol. 23 (2) , 83-96
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10889379909377667
Abstract
Numerical models of the cryosphere cannot be verified and their truthfulness in providing an accurate description of actual physical processes cannot be proven conclusively. At best, models can be confirmed by comparing predictions with independent data that were not used to calibrate model parameters. The more such confirmations are achieved, the greater the confidence that can be placed in the model as a representation of Nature. Most prognostic cryospheric models have not been adequately calibrated and confirmed, and skepticism toward their predictions is therefore warranted.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dynamics of the Siple Coast ice streams, west Antarctica: Results from a thermomechanical ice sheet modelGeophysical Research Letters, 1998
- Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth SciencesScience, 1994
- Ground-water models cannot be validatedAdvances in Water Resources, 1992
- The Greenland ice sheet and greenhouse warmingPalaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 1991
- The Yucca Mountain project: Another perspectiveEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1990
- The Yucca Mountain project: Storage problems of high-level radioactive wastesEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1989
- Program verification: the very ideaCommunications of the ACM, 1988
- The Scientific ImagePublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1980
- The Method of Multiple Working HypothesesScience, 1965
- The inculcation of scientific method by example, with an illustration drawn from the Quaternary geology of UtahAmerican Journal of Science, 1886