Hospital Bloodborne Pathogens Programs: Program Characteristics and Blood and Body Fluid Exposure Rates
- 1 February 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
- Vol. 22 (02) , 73-82
- https://doi.org/10.1086/501867
Abstract
Objective: To describe hospital practices and policies relating to bloodborne pathogens and current rates of occupational exposure among healthcare workers. Participants and Methods: Hospitals in Iowa and Virginia were surveyed in 1996 and 1997 about Standard Precautions training programs and compliance. The primary outcome measures were rates of percutaneous injuries and mucocutaneous exposures. Results: 153 (64%) of 240 hospitals responded. New employee training was offered no more than twice per year by nearly one third. Most (79%-80%) facilities monitored compliance of nurses, housekeepers, and laboratory technicians; physicians rarely were trained or monitored. Implementation of needlestick prevention devices was the most common action taken to decrease sharps injuries. Over one half of hospitals used needleless intravenous systems; larger hospitals used these significantly more often. Protected devices for phlebotomy or intravenous placement were purchased by only one third. Most (89% of large and 80% of small) hospitals met the recommended infection control personnel-to-bed ratio of 1:250. Eleven percent did not have access to postexposure care during all working hours. Percutaneous injury surveillance relied on incident reports (99% of facilities) and employee health records (61%). The annual reported percutaneous injury incidence rate from 106 hospitals was 5.3 injuries per 100 personnel. Compared to single tertiary-referral institution rates determined more than 5 years previously, current injury rates remain elevated in community hospitals. Conclusions: Healthcare institutions need to commit sufficient resources to Standard Precautions training and monitoring and to infection control programs to meet the needs of all workers, including physicians. Healthcare workers clearly remain at risk for injury. Further effective interventions are needed for employee training, improving adherence, and providing needlestick prevention devices.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Case–Control Study of HIV Seroconversion in Health Care Workers after Percutaneous ExposureNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- The Routine Wearing of GlovesAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1996
- Orthopedic Trauma Surgeons' Attitudes and Practices Towards Bloodborne PathogensJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 1996
- Compliance With Recommendations for Universal Precautions Among Prehospital ProvidersAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1995
- Temporal Association Between Implementation of Universal Precautions and a Sustained, Progressive Decrease in Percutaneous Exposures to BloodClinical Infectious Diseases, 1994
- A comparison of observed and self-reported compliance with universal precautions among emergency department personnel at a minnesota public teaching hospital: Implications for assessing infection control programsAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1992
- Risk of Exposure of Surgical Personnel to Patients' Blood during Surgery at San Francisco General HospitalNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Does anonymity increase response rate in postal questionnaire surveys about sensitive subjects? A randomised trial.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1990
- Risk of Transmitting the Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Cytomegalovirus, and Hepatitis B Virus to Health Care Workers Exposed to Patients with AIDS and AIDS-Related ConditionsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1987
- Mail Surveys and Response Rates: A Literature ReviewJournal of Marketing Research, 1975