Problems with current methods of data analysis and reporting, and suggestions for moving beyond incorrect ritual
- 1 June 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in European Journal of Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 9 (2) , 203-207
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00063110-200206000-00021
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sifting the evidence---what's wrong with significance tests? Another comment on the role of statistical methodsBMJ, 2001
- Null hypothesis significance testing: On the survival of a flawed method.American Psychologist, 2001
- The Null Hypothesis Testing Controversy in PsychologyJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1999
- p < 0.05: Threshold for Decerebrate GenuflectionAcademic Emergency Medicine, 1999
- The earth is round (p < .05).American Psychologist, 1994
- p Values, Hypothesis Tests, and Likelihood: Implications for Epidemiology of a Neglected Historical DebateAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1993
- Evidence and scientific research.American Journal of Public Health, 1988
- Identifiability, Exchangeability, and Epidemiological ConfoundingInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1986
- Reporting the results of epidemiologic studies.American Journal of Public Health, 1986
- The fallacy of the null-hypothesis significance test.Psychological Bulletin, 1960