Medicare Peer Review Organization Preprocedure Review Criteria
- 13 March 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA)
- Vol. 265 (10) , 1265-1270
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1991.03460100067026
Abstract
The Medicare Peer Review Organization (PRO) program includes preprocedure review using explicit criteria to assess the appropriateness of specific procedures. This study evaluates the variability in the PRO preprocedure criteria for the three procedures most frequently reviewed by PROs: carotid endarterectomy, cataract removal, and cardiac pacemaker implants. In August 1989, the PRO review criteria were received from the Health Care Financing Administration. To provide a reference point for reviewing the PRO criteria, national practice guidelines for these three procedures were identified. Wide variability was demonstrated in the PRO procedure-specific carotid endarterectomy and cataract removal review criteria among PROs, and the criteria differed significantly from the identified practice guidelines. The criteria for cardiac pacemaker implants were somewhat less variable, and were based, to varying degrees, on practice guidelines developed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC). Greater attention is needed to improve the development of review criteria, including the use of relevant practice guidelines, to ensure that review criteria are optimal. (JAMA. 1991;265:1265-1270)Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of prospective peer review on pacemaker implantation rates in MassachusettsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1990
- Development of Practice Parameters by Physician OrganizationsQRB - Quality Review Bulletin, 1990
- National Health Care Spending Trends: 1988Health Affairs, 1990
- Dramatic changes in the performance of endarterectomy for diseases of the extracranial arteries of the head.Stroke, 1988
- Criteria, norms and standards of quality: what do they mean?American Journal of Public Health, 1981