Relationships between Cigarette Consumption and Biomarkers of Tobacco Toxin Exposure
- 1 December 2005
- journal article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Vol. 14 (12) , 2963-2968
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-04-0768
Abstract
Epidemiologic studies show a dose-response relationship between cigarettes per day and health outcomes such as heart and lung disease, and health outcomes are related to some biomarkers of tobacco exposure. The objective of this study was to examine the relationships between cigarettes per day and levels of selected biomarkers of tobacco toxin exposure: carbon monoxide (CO), metabolites of the tobacco-specific carcinogen 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [total 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) and 1-hydroxypyrene (1-HOP), respectively], and total cotinine (cotinine plus cotinine-N-glucuronide). We did a cross-sectional analysis of merged data from (a) two clinical trials and (b) two cohorts of light smokers (total n = 400). The mean age of participants was 50.4 years and the range of cigarette consumption was 1 to 100/d; however, few subjects smoked >45 cigarettes/d (n = 12). Results show that levels of the biomarkers CO, total NNAL, and total cotinine increase with an increase in the number of cigarettes smoked per day, but not in a linear fashion. 1-HOP is a less discriminating biomarker as levels are relatively stable regardless of the number of cigarettes smoked per day. There is considerable variability in toxin measurement, especially at high levels of smoking. There was a significant correlation between cigarettes per day and total NNAL, 1-HOP, total cotinine, and CO. Total NNAL was highly significantly correlated with total cotinine and CO and also significantly correlated with 1-HOP. These findings suggest that the number of cigarettes smoked per day is not necessarily a reliable measure of toxin exposure and may underestimate tobacco toxin exposure at low levels of smoking or overestimate exposure at high levels of smoking. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14(12):2963-8)Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Similar Uptake of Lung Carcinogens by Smokers of Regular, Light, and Ultralight CigarettesCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2005
- Surrogate Markers for Cardiovascular DiseaseCirculation, 2004
- Tobacco carcinogens, their biomarkers and tobacco-induced cancerNature Reviews Cancer, 2003
- Tobacco smoke carcinogens, DNA damage and p53 mutations in smoking-associated cancersOncogene, 2002
- Benchmark guideline for urinary 1-hydroxypyrene as biomarker of occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsAnnals of Occupational Hygiene, 2001
- Tobacco Smoke Carcinogens and Lung CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1999
- Error in smoking measures: effects of intervention on relations of cotinine and carbon monoxide to self-reported smoking. The Lung Health Study Research Group.American Journal of Public Health, 1993
- Discrimination of Smoking Status by Thiocyanate and Cotinine in Serum, and Carbon Monoxide in Expired AirInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1992
- The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance QuestionnaireBritish Journal of Addiction, 1991
- Cotinine in the serum, saliva, and urine of nonsmokers, passive smokers, and active smokers.American Journal of Public Health, 1988