Siamese Twins? Performance indicators in the service of accountability and enhancement
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Quality in Higher Education
- Vol. 1 (1) , 13-30
- https://doi.org/10.1080/1353832950010102
Abstract
This paper draws on sources from a number of countries in an examination of developments in the use of performance indicators. Conceptual foundations for the use of indicators are discussed with particular reference to the tension between the purposes of accountability (to which the literature shows the greater attention has been given) and enhancement. Drawing on the outcomes of a project sponsored by the former Council for National Academic Awards, a case is argued for the use of indicators designed to support the enhancement of quality in higher education, which may need to be ‘softer’ than the statistical measures (themselves not perfectly ‘hard’) used for the purposes of accountability.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- The significance of disciplinary differencesStudies in Higher Education, 1994
- PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN CANADIAN UNIVERSITIES: MAKING A START IN THE AREA OF TEACHINGFinancial Accountability & Management, 1993
- The r le of performance indicators in higher educationHigher Education, 1992
- A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience QuestionnaireStudies in Higher Education, 1991