Partisanship in the Appropriations Process
- 1 April 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in American Politics Quarterly
- Vol. 13 (2) , 188-199
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x8501300203
Abstract
The incremental budgeting literature has long suggested that the appropriations process is largely nonpartisan in character, a conclusion that is often, inappropriately we believe, based on Fenno's (1966) findings in Power of the Purse. We systematically reexamine Fenno's interpretation of partisanship as a supplement to the dominant mstitutional roles that govern appropriations politics. Analysis of variance tests of the Fenno data provide strong support for the conclusion that partisanship plays an important-if secondary— role in budgetary politics.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Presidential Spending PowerPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,2015
- Fiscal Role and Partisanship in California's Budgetary Process, 1962–1976Public Budgeting & Finance, 1981
- Competition, Control and Spurious Covariation: A Longitudinal Analysis of State SpendingAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1981
- In Congress Reassembled: Reconciliation and the Legislative ProcessPs, 1981
- The Reagan Budget: A Significant Departure from the PastPs, 1981
- Reconciliation 1982: What Happened?Ps, 1981
- Party Control and Policy ChangeAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1976
- Political Change and Spending Shifts in the American StatesAmerican Politics Quarterly, 1974
- The Politics of RedistributionAmerican Political Science Review, 1970
- A Theory of the Budgetary ProcessAmerican Political Science Review, 1966