Constituency Bias in a Federal Career System?

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
A discriminant analysis of environmentalist and industrialist constituent publics of the U.S. Forest Service along with agency responses to 26 attitude, preference, and conservation value questions demonstrates that field-level line officers of this elite federal career system share attitudes and preferences with only one of these constituencies. Rather than holding the middle-ground position between these two groups, described by Culhane in a 1981 book on politics and the public lands. Service attitudes are more consistent with a 1979 land use decision made by their agency, which allocated 58.3% of the U.S. de facto wilderness land for the use of its industrial clientele and 24.3% in favor of the environmentalist position. Group means (centroids) show that Forest Service managers' attitudes overlap heavily with their industrialist constituency, but only slightly overlap with their environmentalist constituency.

This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit: