Availability, Wishful Thinking, and Physicians' Diagnostic Judgments for Patients with Suspected Bacteremia
- 1 August 1991
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Medical Decision Making
- Vol. 11 (3) , 159-168
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x9101100303
Abstract
A prospective cohort study was done to assess the effects of value bias and the inappropriate use of the availability heuristic on physicians' judgments of the probability of bacteremia. Subjects of the study were 227 medical inpatients in a university hospital who had blood cultures done. Estimates of the probabilities that individual patients would have positive blood cultures were collected from the house officers who ordered the cultures. Clinical data and culture results were also obtained. Based on the data the authors calculated "value varia bles," reflecting doctors' assessments of the risks that individual patients would die in the hospital if they were to have bacteremia. "Recalled experience variables" reflected the doctors' recollections of recent experiences with patients with bacteremia. The physicians significantly overestimated the likelihood of bacteremia for most of their patients. Their ROC curve for this diagnosis showed moderate discriminating ability (area = 0.687, SE = 0.073). Two recalled experience variables were significantly associated with the physicians' prob ability estimates. The value variables were significantly inversely associated with them. These relationships were independent of several clinical variables and measures of disease severity. The physicians' intuitive diagnostic judgments were thus influenced by the availability heu ristic and by wishful thinking, a form of the value bias. The availability heuristic may mislead physicians by causing them to believe that random variations in the prevalence of a non- epidemic disease represent real trends. Wishful thinking may lead physicians to underes timate the likelihood of a disease for patients most at risk for its consequences. Teaching physicians to develop better judgmental strategies may improve the quality of their judgments and hence their patient care. Key words: diagnosis; probability; septicemia; availability heu ristic ; value bias. (Med Decis Making 1991;11:159-168)Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are Two (Inexperienced) Heads Better Than One (Experienced) Head? Averaging House Officers?? Prognostic Judgments for Critically Ill PatientsSurvey of Anesthesiology, 1992
- The answer to “What are my chances, Doctor?” depends on whom is askedCritical Care Medicine, 1989
- Cognitive errors in diagnosis: Instantiation, classification, and consequencesThe American Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Eualuating Physicians' Probabilistic JudgmentsMedical Decision Making, 1988
- On the Significance of Judgment StudiesMedical Decision Making, 1988
- Physicians' Estimates of the Probability of Myocardial Infarction in Emergency Boom Patients with chest PainMedical Decision Making, 1986
- A signal detection framework for the evaluation of probabilistic forecastsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1985
- APACHE IICritical Care Medicine, 1985
- Physicians' use of probabilistic information in a real clinical setting.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981
- The effect of outcome desirability on information required for decisionsBehavioral Science, 1967