Clinical care pathways: Decreasing resource utilization in head and neck surgical patients
- 31 December 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery
- Vol. 121 (6) , 755-759
- https://doi.org/10.1053/hn.1999.v121.a98217
Abstract
In this era of decreasing reimbursement, health systems have been forced to become more efficient and decrease resource utilization to remain financially viable. One of the methods of internal cost control has been the use of clinical pathways. Given the complexity of treatment of head and neck cancer patients, clinical pathways can help to standardize decision making and introduce uniformity in resource utilization. The objective of this study is to compare resource utilization and outcomes before and after implementation of a clinical pathway for head and neck surgical patients. We observed significant decreases in hospital costs as well as shorter lengths of stay after pathway implementation. It is our belief that a uniform management tool is beneficial in this complex disease.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of a critical pathway on the results of carotid endarterectomy in a tertiary care university hospital: Effect of methods on outcomeJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1997
- The outcome of medical outcomes assessmentAcademic Medicine, 1997
- Comparison of ampicillin/sulbactam versus clindamycin in the prevention of infection in patients undergoing head and neck surgeryHead & Neck, 1997
- Critical Pathways for Head and Neck Surgery: Development and ImplementationJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1997
- Impact of clinical pathways on hospital costs and early outcome after major vascular surgeryJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1995
- Critical Pathways as a Strategy for Improving Care: Problems and PotentialAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1995
- Ampicillin-Sulbactam vs Clindamycin in Head and Neck Oncologic Surgery: The Need for Gram-negative CoverageJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1992