The relationship between speech perception and electrode discrimination in cochlear implantees
- 1 September 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 108 (3) , 1269-1280
- https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1287711
Abstract
Speech Intelligibility Index (SII) procedures were used to measure the amount of speech information perceived in five frequency bands (170–570, 570–1170, 1170–1768, 1768–2680, and 2680–5744 Hz) by 15 users of the Cochlear Ltd. CI-22M implant and Spectra-22/SPEAK processor. The speech information perceived was compared to that perceived by normal-hearing listeners. The ability of these subjects to discriminate between stimulation on adjacent electrodes corresponding to each frequency band was also investigated, using a 4IFC procedure with random current level variations of between 0% and 60% of the dynamic range. Relative to normal-hearing listeners, speech information was, on average, significantly more reduced in the four frequency regions between 170 and 2680 Hz than in the region 2680–5744 Hz. There was a significant correlation between electrode discrimination ability (when the random level variation encompassed 20% or more of the dynamic range) and the amount of speech information perceived in the four frequency regions between 170 and 2680 Hz. There was no such correlation in the region 2680–5744 Hz, regardless of the extent of random level variation. These results indicate that speech information in the low to medium frequencies is more difficult for implantees to perceive, that this difficulty is correlated with the difficulty in discriminating electrode place in the presence of random loudness variations, and that fine spectral discrimination may be relatively more important in the vowel-formant regions than in higher frequency regions.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- The recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of cochlear-implant signal processors with 6–20 channelsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1998
- The Identification of Consonants and Vowels by Cochlear Implant Patients Using a 6-Channel Continuous Interleaved Sampling Processor and by Normal-Hearing Subjects Using Simulations of Processors with Two to Nine ChannelsEar & Hearing, 1998
- Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: Predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplificationThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1998
- Speech Recognition as a Function of the Number of Electrodes Used in the SPEAK Cochlear Implant Speech ProcessorJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1997
- Comparison of electrode discrimination, pitch ranking, and pitch scaling data in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjectsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1997
- Factors Affecting Auditory Performance of Postlinguistically Deaf Adults Using Cochlear ImplantsAudiology and Neurotology, 1996
- Factors Predicting Postoperative Sentence Scores in Postlinguistically Deaf Adult Cochlear Implant PatientsAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 1992
- Longitudinal Changes in Word Recognition by Patients Who Use the Ineraid Cochlear ImplantEar & Hearing, 1990
- Articulation index predictions of contextually dependent wordsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1986
- Factors Governing the Intelligibility of Speech SoundsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1947