Cutaneous basophil responses and immune resistance of guinea pigs to ticks: passive transfer with peritoneal exudate cells or serum.
Open Access
- 1 November 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Journal of Immunology
- Vol. 127 (5) , 2163-2167
- https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.127.5.2163
Abstract
Resistance to infestation by larval Amblyomma americanum or Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks was transferred to naive guinea pigs with peritoneal exudate cells (PEC) or serum from donors immunized by prior infestation with homologous tick larvae. In the A. americanum system, PEC transfer induced 87% tick rejection, which was similar to the level of resistance in actively sensitized hosts. In the R. sanguineus system, PEC conferred resistance (39% rejection) that was weaker than in actively sensitized hosts (57% rejection). In both systems, immune serum conferred significant but weaker resistance (20 to 29% rejection). In actively sensitized hosts, resistance to each tick species was specific, but there was considerable cross-reactive resistance. Basophils dominated the 24-hr challenge feeding sites of A. americanum ticks in actively sensitized hosts (69% of the infiltrate) and recipients of sensitized PEC (69%). Mononuclear cells were dominant (69% of the infiltrate) in the challenged tissues of immune serum recipients that had a significant but weaker cutaneous basophil response (24%). Mononuclear cells also dominated (58% of the infiltrate) the 24-hr challenge feeding sites of R. sanguineus ticks in actively sensitized hosts, but there were also 24% basophils. These studies demonstrate that immune resistance to tick is dependent on sensitized lymphoid cells or serum components, and that sensitized cells or serum can transfer a cutaneous basophil response that is associated with immune resistance. Rejection of ticks is usually associated with large basophil infiltrates, but sometimes mononuclear cells are dominant. Thus, immune resistance of guinea pigs to ticks is a heterogeneous response in which immune cells and serum probably act to recruit diverse effector leukocytes to mediate rejection that is specific but significantly cross-reactive.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Response of hypersensitized guinea pigs to the feeding ofAmblyomma americanumticksParasitology, 1981
- Artificial Immunity to Dermacentor Variabilis (Acari: Ixodidae): Vaccination Using Tick Antigens1Journal of Medical Entomology, 1980
- Boophilus microplus: the effect of histamine on the attachment of cattle-tick larvae–studies in vivo and in vitroParasitology, 1980
- Amblyomma americanum: Sequential histological analysis of larval and nymphal feeding sites on guinea pigsExperimental Parasitology, 1980
- Damage to Trichinella Spiralis Newborn Larvae by Eosinophil Major Basic Protein *The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 1979
- Damage to Schistosomula of Schistosoma Mansoni Induced Directly by Eosinophil Major Basic ProteinThe Journal of Immunology, 1979
- HISTOLOGY OF BOVINE SKIN REACTIONS TO IXODES HOLOCYCLUS NEUMANN1977
- Cutaneous Basophil Hypersensitivity Uncovered in the Cell Transfer of Classical Tuberculin HypersensitivityThe Journal of Immunology, 1976