A point‐charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed‐phase quantum mechanical calculations
Top Cited Papers
- 25 September 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Computational Chemistry
- Vol. 24 (16) , 1999-2012
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.10349
Abstract
Molecular mechanics models have been applied extensively to study the dynamics of proteins and nucleic acids. Here we report the development of a third‐generation point‐charge all‐atom force field for proteins. Following the earlier approach of Cornell et al., the charge set was obtained by fitting to the electrostatic potentials of dipeptides calculated using B3LYP/cc‐pVTZ//HF/6‐31G** quantum mechanical methods. The main‐chain torsion parameters were obtained by fitting to the energy profiles of Ace‐Ala‐Nme and Ace‐Gly‐Nme di‐peptides calculated using MP2/cc‐pVTZ//HF/6‐31G** quantum mechanical methods. All other parameters were taken from the existing AMBER data base. The major departure from previous force fields is that all quantum mechanical calculations were done in the condensed phase with continuum solvent models and an effective dielectric constant of ε = 4. We anticipate that this force field parameter set will address certain critical short comings of previous force fields in condensed‐phase simulations of proteins. Initial tests on peptides demonstrated a high‐degree of similarity between the calculated and the statistically measured Ramanchandran maps for both Ace‐Gly‐Nme and Ace‐Ala‐Nme di‐peptides. Some highlights of our results include (1) well‐preserved balance between the extended and helical region distributions, and (2) favorable type‐II poly‐proline helical region in agreement with recent experiments. Backward compatibility between the new and Cornell et al. charge sets, as judged by overall agreement between dipole moments, allows a smooth transition to the new force field in the area of ligand‐binding calculations. Test simulations on a large set of proteins are also discussed. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 24: 1999–2012, 2003Keywords
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Force Field Influence on the Observation of π-Helical Protein Structures in Molecular Dynamics SimulationsThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2003
- Absolute comparison of simulated and experimental protein-folding dynamicsNature, 2002
- β-hairpin folding simulations in atomistic detail using an implicit solvent model 1 1Edited by F. CohenJournal of Molecular Biology, 2001
- Generalized Born Models of Macromolecular Solvation EffectsAnnual Review of Physical Chemistry, 2000
- Molecular dynamics simulation study of DNA dodecamer d(CGCGAATTCGCG) in solution: conformation and hydrationJournal of Molecular Biology, 1997
- Observation of theA-DNA toB-DNA Transition During Unrestrained Molecular Dynamics in Aqueous SolutionJournal of Molecular Biology, 1996
- Energy Functions that Discriminate X-ray and Near-native Folds from Well-constructed DecoysJournal of Molecular Biology, 1996
- A well-behaved electrostatic potential based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic charges: the RESP modelThe Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1993
- Electron affinities of the first-row atoms revisited. Systematic basis sets and wave functionsThe Journal of Chemical Physics, 1992
- Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid waterThe Journal of Chemical Physics, 1983