Seeing is believing? A beginners' guide to practical pitfalls in image acquisition
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 2 January 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Rockefeller University Press in The Journal of cell biology
- Vol. 172 (1) , 9-18
- https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200507103
Abstract
Imaging can be thought of as the most direct of experiments. You see something; you report what you see. If only things were truly this simple. Modern imaging technology has brought about a revolution in the kinds of questions we can approach, but this comes at the price of increasingly complex equipment. Moreover, in an attempt to market competing systems, the microscopes have often been inappropriately described as easy to use and suitable for near-beginners. Insufficient understanding of the experimental manipulations and equipment set-up leads to the introduction of errors during image acquisition. In this feature, I review some of the most common practical pitfalls faced by researchers during image acquisition, and how they can affect the interpretation of the experimental data.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- What's in a picture? The temptation of image manipulationThe Journal of cell biology, 2004
- Automatic and Quantitative Measurement of Protein-Protein Colocalization in Live CellsBiophysical Journal, 2004
- Multicolor Imaging: The Important Question of Co-LocalizationBioTechniques, 2001
- Measurement of Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer in the Optical MicroscopePublished by Springer Nature ,2001
- Chapter 3: Quantitative Imaging of the Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP)Published by Elsevier ,1998
- Objective Lenses for Confocal MicroscopyPublished by Springer Nature ,1995
- The Pixilated ImagePublished by Springer Nature ,1995
- Comparison of Wide-Field/Deconvolution and Confocal Microscopy for 3D ImagingPublished by Springer Nature ,1995
- Guiding Principles of Specimen Preservation for Confocal Fluorescence MicroscopyPublished by Springer Nature ,1995
- Measurement of co‐localization of objects in dual‐colour confocal imagesJournal of Microscopy, 1993