Narrative: Mode of discourse or paradigm?
- 1 September 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Monographs
- Vol. 54 (3) , 264-275
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758709390232
Abstract
This essay critically analyzes the recent work of Walter. Fisher on the “narrative paradigm.”; While Fisher's work has undeniable value, the implications of it have not been completely considered. This essay proposes three limitations on the narrative paradigm. First, Fisher's definition of narrative is too broad, encompassing nearly all discourse. Using Fisher's example of The Fate of the Earth, a case is built for the claim that a more limited definition of narrative is needed. Second, the view that there is an independent standard of narrative rationality that can be distinguished from the “rational world paradigm”; is considered and rejected. Finally, the claim that the proper role of the expert in the public sphere is that of story teller is also considered and rejected.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The narrative paradigm: An elaborationCommunication Monographs, 1985
- Toward a New Political NarrativeJournal of Communication, 1985
- Symbolic Convergence Theory: A Communication FormulationJournal of Communication, 1985
- Re-constructing Narrative Theory: A Functional PerspectiveJournal of Communication, 1985
- The Narrative Paradigm: In the BeginningJournal of Communication, 1985
- Narrative in Natural Discourse: On Conversation and RhetoricJournal of Communication, 1985
- Rhetorical conversation, time, and moral actionQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1985
- Narration as a human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argumentCommunication Monographs, 1984
- Myth, Ritual, and Political ControlJournal of Communication, 1980
- Storytelling in criminal trials: A model of social judgmentQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1978