Keynesian Uncertainty and the Weight of Arguments
- 1 October 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Economics and Philosophy
- Vol. 6 (2) , 275-292
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266267100001255
Abstract
In Chapter 12 of the General Theory, on “The State of Long-Term Expectation,” Keynes writes: “It would be foolish, in forming our expectations, to attach great weight to matters which are very uncertain” (CW VII, p. 148). In a footnote to this sentence, Keynes points out that by “very uncertain” he does not mean the same as “very improbable” and refers to the chapter on “The Weight of Arguments” in his earlier Treatise on Probability (CW VIII, pp. 77–85). The purpose of this article, in the first place, is to provide an account of, and to sort out the relations between, Keynes's views on probability, uncertainty, and the weight of arguments.This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Not Very Likely: A Reply to RamseyThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1989
- The Relative/Absolute Nature of Knowledge and Economic AnalysisThe Economic Journal, 1987
- Rational spirits and the post Keynesian macrotheory of microeconomicsDe Economist, 1987
- Uncertainty and Economic AnalysisThe Economic Journal, 1985
- CAMBRIDGE PROBABILITY THEORISTSThe Manchester School, 1985
- ‘Uncertainty’ in Keynes’ General theory: a commentHistory of Political Economy, 1983
- Uncertainty in MicroeconomicsRevue économique, 1981
- Imagination and the Nature of Choice.The Economic Journal, 1980
- Uncertainty and Expectations in Economics. Essays in Honour of G. L. S. ShackleCanadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 1972
- Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage AxiomsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1961