Determination of HER2 Gene Amplification by Fluorescence In situ Hybridization and Concordance with the Clinical Trials Immunohistochemical Assay in Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer Evaluated for Treatment with Trastuzumab
- 1 September 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
- Vol. 93 (1) , 3-11
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-004-6275-8
Abstract
Purpose. To evaluate the concordance between HER2 gene amplification, determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and HER2 protein overexpression assessed by an immunohistochemical (IHC) assay. The IHC protocol used was a research assay, known as the Clinical Trial Assay (CTA), developed to select women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) for three pivotal clinical trials of trastuzumab therapy. Methods. A direct-labeled, dual-probe FISH assay was used to determine HER2 amplification in 623 fixed breast cancer tissue specimens. These specimens had been stored as paraffin-embedded sections for 2ᾢ5 years. All specimens had been analyzed for HER2 protein expression by the CTA. To assess the reproducibility of FISH results in archived material, we evaluated a separate group of 617 breast cancer tissue specimens at two di erent laboratories. Results. Informative FISH results were available for 529 (85%) of the 623 specimens. Overall concordance between FISH and IHC results was 82% (95% CI; 78ᾢ85%). Assay agreement between FISH results and specimens with immunostaining scores of 0, 1+, and 3+ were 97, 93 and 89%, respectively. However, only 24% of specimens with 2+ immunostaining scores had HER2 amplification by FISH; there was assay disagreement in 76% of specimens in this IHC subgroup. Interlaboratory FISH concordance was 92% (95% CI; 89ᾢ94%), indicating very good assay reproducibility in these archived specimens. Conclusion. HER2 status determined by CTA-IHC and FISH are significantly correlated; however, differences between these two assays can a ect patient selection for trastuzumab therapy.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- The clinical evaluation of HER‐2 status: which test to use?The Journal of Pathology, 2003
- HER2 status in patients with breast carcinoma is not modified selectively by preoperative chemotherapy and is stable during the metastatic processCancer, 2002
- Determination of Her-2/Neu Status in Breast Carcinoma: Comparative Analysis of Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescent In Situ HybridizationLaboratory Investigation, 2000
- HER-2/neu Assessment in Breast Cancer by Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization: Comparison of Results and Correlation With SurvivalMolecular Diagnosis, 2000
- The HER‐2/ neu Oncogene in Breast Cancer: Prognostic Factor, Predictive Factor, and Target for TherapyThe International Journal of Cell Cloning, 1998
- A scoring system for immunohistochemical staining: consensus report of the task force for basic research of the EORTC-GCCG. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Gynaecological Cancer Cooperative Group.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1997
- Stability of HER-2/neu Expression Over Time and at Multiple Metastatic SitesJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- Studies of the HER-2/ neu Proto-Oncogene in Human Breast and Ovarian CancerScience, 1989
- Human Breast Cancer: Correlation of Relapse and Survival with Amplification of the HER-2/ neu OncogeneScience, 1987
- Tyrosine Kinase Receptor with Extensive Homology to EGF Receptor Shares Chromosomal Location with neu OncogeneScience, 1985