A qualitative evaluation of information leaflets for gastroscopy procedure
- 30 October 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
- Vol. 9 (4) , 423-431
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00397.x
Abstract
Written information sent to patients prior to diagnostic gastroscopy is an important part of the process of informing and preparing them for the procedure. Yet there is ample evidence in the literature that information leaflets do not measure up to the required standard. In this study, information leaflets from a random sample of seven hospitals in Northern Ireland that carried out gastroscopy as a day procedure were evaluated using a checklist of items recommended by the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) for inclusion in leaflets for patients undergoing diagnostic gastroscopy. The results showed that the number of written materials sent to patients prior to the procedure varied between units. There were inconsistencies in the information given by the same unit, and overall, there was a lack of vital information in most of the leaflets. Some of the information was confusing and ambiguous. The potential risk of the procedure was explained in only one of the leaflets. Patients’ right to choose to have a mild sedative was not made clear in most of the leaflets. More should be done to address these gaps and inconsistencies in the written information provided to patients prior to gastroscopy.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Audit of sedated versus unsedated gastroscopy: Do patients notice a difference?Journal of Quality In Clinical Practice, 2001
- A systematic review of patient information leaflets for hypertensionJournal of Human Hypertension, 2000
- Postal consent for upper gastrointestinal endoscopyGut, 2000
- DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choicesJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1999
- Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough?BMJ, 1999
- Evaluation of readability and accuracy of information leaflets in general practice for patients with asthmaBMJ, 1998
- Prospective audit of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions of England: safety, staffing, and sedation methods.Gut, 1995
- Potential Risks and Preventive Measures for Pulmonary AspirationAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1993
- Preoperative Oral FluidsAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1986
- Behavioral Preparation of Patients for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Information, Relaxation, and Coping StyleJournal of Human Stress, 1982