Segmental Spinal Instrumentation in Idiopathic Scoliosis

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Eighty-six patients with idiopathic scoliosis who underwent a posterior spinal fusion using sublaminar segmental spinal instrumentation were analyzed retrospectively. There were two operative groups: group 1,66 patients who had Harrington rod instrumentation and segmental wiring, and group 2, 20 patients who had Luque rod instrumentation. The clinical and radiographic data of the two groups were similar except for the passage of more sublaminar wires and increased intraoperative blood loss in group 2. Twenty intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred in 19 patients (22%) including 14 neurologic complications. Three patients (3%) had major spinal cord injuries, while 11 patients (13%) had transient sensory changes. There was no significant difference in the incidence of neurologic complications between group 1 or group 2. The remaining intraoperative complications were due either to anesthesia, positioning during surgery, or technique (dural tear). Late complications occurred in two patients in group 1 only: one each with rod breakage and hook displacement. Only one patient (1%) has required additional surgery. Our results indicate that although segmental instrumentation can be beneficial in idiopathic scoliosis, the incidence of complications, primarily neurologic, will be higher than expected. The major reason appears to be surgeon inexperience with passage of sublaminar wires. As experience increases, the incidence of complications declines and becomes comparable with conventional Harrington rod instrumentation alone.