How should atypical prostate needle biopsies be reported? Controversies regarding the term “ASAP”
Open Access
- 1 December 1999
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Human Pathology
- Vol. 30 (12) , 1401-1402
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0046-8177(99)90155-7
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- ASAP is a bad ideaHuman Pathology, 1999
- REPEAT BIOPSY CANCER INCIDENCE RATES FOLLOWING A NEGATIVE, HIGH GRADE PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA (HG-PIN) OR SUSPICIOUS DIAGNOSISJournal of Urology, 1999
- Follow-up of atypical prostate needle biopsies suspicious for cancerUrology, 1999
- Repeat biopsy strategies for men with atypical diagnoses on initial prostate needle biopsyUrology, 1998
- Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation Suspicious for Malignancy in Prostate Needle BiopsiesThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1997
- Incidence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in sextant needle biopsy specimensUrology, 1997
- Repeat Biopsy Strategy in Men with Isolated Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia on Prostate Needle BiopsyJournal of Urology, 1996