"Not clinically indicated": patients' interests or resource allocation?
Open Access
- 6 February 1993
- Vol. 306 (6874) , 379-381
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.306.6874.379
Abstract
The decision that a particular intervention is not clinically indicated may conceal two quite different ethical assumptions. The first assumption is that the intervention is not of overall benefit to this patient. The second is that limited resources should not be used for this patient. These issues are discussed with reference to cardiac surgery in elderly patients with reference to the main theories of allocation: QALYs, needs theories, the sanctity of life theory, the lottery theory, and market forces.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- An alternative to QALYs: the saved young life equivalent (SAVE)BMJ, 1992
- Predictors of Event-Free Survival after Balloon Aortic ValvuloplastyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Cardiac surgery in the octogenarian: Perioperative outcome and clinical follow-upJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1991
- Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in persons aged 80 years and overThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1991
- Valve replacement in the octogenarianThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1989
- Open-Heart Surgery in OctogenariansNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Natural History of Candidates for Balloon Aortic ValvuloplastyMayo Clinic Proceedings, 1987
- Spontaneous course of aortic valve diseaseEuropean Heart Journal, 1987
- Cardiac surgery in the octogenarianThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1986
- Cardiac operations in patients over 80 years of ageThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1985