A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery to surgery alone for resectable esophageal cancer
- 1 March 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 183 (3) , 274-279
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00795-x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analysis of Reduced Death and Complication Rates After Esophageal ResectionAnnals of Surgery, 2001
- Improvement in the Results of Surgical Treatment of Advanced Squamous Esophageal Carcinoma During 15 Consecutive YearsAnnals of Surgery, 2000
- Transhiatal Esophagectomy: Clinical Experience and RefinementsAnnals of Surgery, 1999
- Is there a role for radical esophagectomy*1European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1999
- Node status in transmural esophageal adenocarcinoma and outcome after en bloc esophagectomyThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1999
- Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery Compared with Surgery Alone for Localized Esophageal CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Preoperative chemotherapy versus surgical therapy alone for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: A prospective randomized trialThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1997
- Induction chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with carcinoma of the esophagusJournal of Surgical Oncology, 1994
- Randomized Trial of Preoperative Chemotherapy for Squamous Cell Cancer of the EsophagusArchives of Surgery, 1992
- Pre‐operative radiotherapy prolongs survival in operable esophageal carcinoma: A randomized, multicenter study of pre‐operative radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The second scandinavian trial in esophageal cancerWorld Journal of Surgery, 1992