The value of follow-up in patients treated for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
- 1 February 1992
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal Of Cancer
- Vol. 28 (2-3) , 426-430
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-8049(05)80068-1
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is routine triple endoscopy cost-effective in head and neck cancer?The American Journal of Surgery, 1988
- Lung cancer in patients with head and neck cancer: Incidence and long-term survivalThe American Journal of Surgery, 1987
- An assessment of the value of triple endoscopy in the evaluation of head and neck cancer patientsJournal of Surgical Oncology, 1986
- Value of routine follow up of women treated for early carcinoma of the breast.BMJ, 1985
- The Role of Endoscopy in Evaluating Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Prospective StudyJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1985
- Routine Panendoscopy--Is It Necessary Every Time?JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1984
- Second malignant neoplasms in patients successfully treated with multimodality treatment for advanced head and neck cancerHead & Neck Surgery, 1984
- SECOND RESPIRATORY AND UPPER DIGESTIVE TRACT CANCERS AFTER ORAL CANCERThe Lancet, 1981
- Second primary respiratory tract malignancies in glottic carcinomaCancer, 1980
- Value of outpatient follow-up after curative surgery for carcinoma of the large bowel.BMJ, 1980