Effects of high-pass and low-pass spatial filtering on face identification
- 1 June 1996
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Perception & Psychophysics
- Vol. 58 (4) , 602-612
- https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03213093
Abstract
If face images are degraded by block averaging, there is a nonlinear decline in recognition accuracy as block size increases, suggesting that identification requires a critical minimum range of object spatial frequencies. The identification of faces was measured with equivalent Fourier low-pass filtering and block averaging preserving the same information and with high-pass transformations. In Experiment 1, accuracy declined and response time increased in a significant nonlinear manner in all cases as the spatial-frequency range was reduced. However, it did so at a faster rate for the quantized and high-passed images. A second experiment controlled for the differences in the contrast of the high-pass faces and found a reduced but significant and nonlinear decline in performance as the spatial-frequency range was reduced. These data suggest that face identification is preferentially supported by a band of spatial frequencies of approximately 8-16 cycles per face; contrast or line-based explanations were found to be inadequate. The data are discussed in terms of current models of face identification.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spatial Content and Spatial Quantisation Effects in Face RecognitionPerception, 1994
- Describing the shapes of faces using surface primitivesImage and Vision Computing, 1993
- Low-dimensional representation of faces in higher dimensions of the face spaceJournal of the Optical Society of America A, 1993
- Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of facesMemory & Cognition, 1992
- Identification of spatially quantised tachistoscopic images of faces: How many pixels does it take to carry identity?The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1991
- The Standard Deviation of Luminance as a Metric for Contrast in Random-Dot ImagesPerception, 1990
- The Role of High Spatial Frequencies in Face PerceptionPerception, 1983
- Simple reaction times to the onset, onset, and contrast reversal of sinusoidal grating stimuliPerception & Psychophysics, 1980
- Recognition of faces in the presence of two-dimensional sinusoidal masksPerception & Psychophysics, 1979
- Masking in Visual Recognition: Effects of Two-Dimensional Filtered NoiseScience, 1973