The Histologic Evaluation of Pulsed Carbon Dioxide Laser Resurfacing versus Phenol Chemical Peels in Vivo
- 1 August 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Dermatologic Surgery
- Vol. 25 (8) , 597-600
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.98246.x
Abstract
Carbon dioxide (CO2) lasers and phenol chemical peels have been used extensively for facial skin resurfacing. The purpose of this study is to compare the histologic effects of phenol chemical peels and CO2 laser ablations. Local preauricular areas were treated with lasers on one side of the face and a phenol peel on the other. One day after the procedures, the affected areas were biopsied for histologic evaluation. The areas were biopsied again after 3 months. The initial biopsies demonstrated that the CO2 lasers ablate more superficial skin than the peels, but the 3-month biopsy specimens showed that the zone of new collagen formation was thicker as a result of the phenol peels. With the parameters used in this study, phenol peels resulted in the formation of a thicker zone of collagen despite the deeper ablation depth of the laser.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Histological and Clinical Evaluation of Facial Resurfacing Using a Carbon Dioxide Laser With the Computer Pattern GeneratorJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1997
- Depth of morphologic skin damage and viability after one, two, and three passes of a high-energy, short-pulse CO 2 laser (Tru-Pulse) in pig skinJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1997
- Pulsed carbon dioxide laser, trichloroacetic acid, Baker-Gordon phenol, and dermabrasion: a comparative clinical and histologic study of cutaneous resurfacing in a porcine modelArchives of Dermatology, 1996
- Animal Study of Skin Resurfacing Using the Ultrapulse Carbon Dioxide LaserAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 1995
- Variations and Comparisons in Medium‐Depth Chemical PeelingThe Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology, 1989
- Occluded Baker‐Gordon Chemical Peel: Review and UpdateThe Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology, 1989